Toward Digital Community Policing: Opportunities and Barriers for Social Media Engagement in Indonesia

  • Meydiarsyah Dharma Herlydinata
Keywords: Community Policing, Digital Policing, Social Media Engagement

Abstract

This study explores the readiness and challenges of integrating social media into community policing in Indonesia. It aims to identify both opportunities and barriers faced by law enforcement, focusing on how digital platforms can improve trust, accessibility, and responsiveness. Through a structured literature review, it examines practical, legal, and institutional factors affecting effective digital engagement. This study uses a qualitative literature review method, analyzing academic articles, official regulations, and policy reports related to community policing and social media. The approach focuses on identifying recurring themes, theoretical insights, and practical challenges to understand how digital tools can support or hinder community policing efforts in the Indonesian context.The study finds that social media presents key opportunities for community policing, such as increased reach, real-time interaction, and enhanced public trust. However, barriers such as digital illiteracy, misinformation, legal uncertainty, and a lack of officer training remain significant. Successful implementation requires institutional support, clear guidelines, and ethical, consistent engagement across digital platforms.The study concludes that while social media can enhance community policing in Indonesia, its success depends on proper training, legal clarity, and ethical use. Digital engagement should be seen as a core policing function, not an add-on. With the right support and strategy, it can build stronger public trust and more responsive police-community relationships.

References

Aisyah, N., & Suherman, S. (2022). Digital policing in Indonesia: Challenges and opportunities for social media adoption. Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 11(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.25008/jki.v11i2.456

Albrecht, J. F. (2025). Issues in Policing: Investigating Current Controversies. Journal of Criminal Justice Education. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10511253.2025.2485984

APJII. (2023). Laporan Survei Internet Indonesia 2023. https://apjii.or.id/survei2023

Aziz, M. A. (2021). Tata Kelola Sumber Daya Polri dalam Implementasi Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Terpadu di Kewilayahan. Jurnal Litbang Polri, 25(1). https://jlp.puslitbang.polri.go.id/jlp/LitbangPOLRI/article/view/162

Bayley, D. H. (2006). Changing the guard: Developing democratic police abroad. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195189780.001.0001

Chaniago, H. R., Syah, B. M., & Wahyuni, S. (2021). Pencegahan ujaran kebencian di media sosial melalui Peringatan Virtual Polisi (PVP) di Bareskrim Polri. Jurnal Keamanan Nasional, 7(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.32412/jkn.v7i2.385

CNN Indonesia. (2021, February 25). Cara kerja Virtual Police: Peringatan polisi dikirim via DM. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20210225093558-12-610074/cara-kerja-virtual-police-peringatan-polisi-dikirim-via-dm

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Hermawan, D., & Rizqi, R. A. (2021). Digital procedural justice: A content analysis of police social media in Indonesia. Media dan Komunikasi, 13(3), 150–168. https://doi.org/10.24843/mdk.v13i3.389

Ismail, U., & Abdullahi, A. (2023). Digital policing in Nigeria: A study of Jigawa State Police Command. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 26(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/14613557231198701

Kemp, S. (2025, January). Digital 2025: Indonesia. DataReportal. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2025-indonesia

Kompas.com. (2021a, February 24). Ini mekanisme Polisi Virtual tegur pelanggar UU ITE di media sosial. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2021/02/24/10415161/ini-mekanisme-polisi-virtual-tegur-pelanggar-uu-ite-di-media-sosial

Kompas.com. (2021b, February 26). Kapolri terbitkan surat edaran soal UU ITE, ini isinya. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2021/02/26/10440091/kapolri-terbitkan-surat-edaran-soal-uu-ite-ini-isinya

Kompas.com. (2021c, July 1). Kapolri: Virtual Police adalah wajah baru kami dalam penegakan hukum siber. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2021/07/01/16023831/kapolri-virtual-police-adalah-wajah-baru-kami-dalam-penegakan-hukum-siber

Kompas.com. (2022, September 6). Polisi unggah video pengamanan demo di Jakarta untuk transparansi publik. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2022/09/06/17350081/polisi-unggah-video-pengamanan-demo-di-jakarta-untuk-transparansi-publik

Kompas.com. (2023, February 25). Polisi minta warga tak terpancing hoaks penculikan anak. https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2023/02/25/120000465/polisi-minta-warga-tak-terpancing-hoaks-penculikan-anak

Kusworo, H. (2021). Peran Media Sosial dalam Meningkatkan Citra Polri di Masyarakat. Jurnal Litbang Polri, 25(2), 95–107. https://jlp.puslitbang.polri.go.id/jlp/LitbangPOLRI/article/view/169

Lampu Merah News. (2024, September). Live IG Kasi Humas Polsek Kemayoran: Polisi hadir beri edukasi dan tanggapi laporan warga secara langsung. https://www.lampumerahnews.id/2024/09/live-ig-kasi-humas-polsek-kemayoran.html

Ndlela, M. N. (2024). Organizational communication in the digital era: Examining the impact of AI, chatbots, and Covid-19. Routledge. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=dkgXEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR5

Nugroho, J. (2023, February 12). Burned alive or beaten: Mob rule in Indonesia over child abduction rumours. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/indonesia-mobs/

Nugroho, R. (2023). Bridging gaps through screens: Police use of Instagram in rural Java. Asian Journal of Media and Communication, 7(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.7454/ajmc.v7i1.345

Nugroho, R., & Fahmi, A. (2021). Opini Publik Terhadap Kinerja Polri dalam Penanganan Kasus melalui Media Online. Jurnal Litbang Polri, 25(2), 77–87. https://jlp.puslitbang.polri.go.id/jlp/LitbangPOLRI/article/view/167

Peraturan Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2021 tentang Pemolisian Masyarakat

Puspitasari, D., & Nugraha, B. (2022). Youth trust and engagement in police social media: A survey in Jakarta. Indonesian Journal of Criminology, 10(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.32412/ijc.v10i1.234

Putra, A. R., Nasution, A., & Salim, M. (2023). Trust-building via transparency: Analyzing police Instagram engagement during protests. Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, 17(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.15408/jsr.v17i1.5321

Rahmat, R., & Farida, Y. (2022). Tantangan Reformasi Regulasi dalam Transformasi Digital Pemerintahan. In Combine Percikan Makara Merah (p. 199). Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia. https://law.ui.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Combine-Percikan.pdf#page=199

Ruddell, R., & Jones, N. (2013). Social media and policing: Matching the message to the audience. Safer Communities, 12(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/17578041311315030

Sari, M. F., & Pratama, I. G. (2021). Digital divide in Indonesia: Access and literacy. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora, 10(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.12962/jish.v10i1.592

Syahputra, M., & Hadibrata, A. (2021). Urgensi Regulasi Digital Etika Pemerintahan dalam Pemanfaatan Media Sosial. In Percikan Pemikiran Makara Merah (pp. 183–195). Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia. https://law.ui.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/e-book-Buku-Percikan-2021.pdf

Tyler, T. R. (2004). Enhancing police legitimacy: A procedural justice perspective. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203262627

Tyler, T. R. (2006). Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Compliance. In Why People Obey the Law (pp. 3–7). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1j66769.4

Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik

Zubiaga, A., Aker, A., Bontcheva, K., Liakata, M., & Procter, R. (2017). Detection and resolution of rumours in social media: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 51(2), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3161603

Published
2025-07-04