Performance Optimization of Unit 1 General Criminal Actions of Sukoharjo Polres Criminal Reserse in Handling Criminal Acts Through Restorative Justice
Abstract
The development of the criminal justice system in Indonesia has always experienced changing dynamics, especially in alternative settlements of criminal acts from Restorative Justiceto restorative justice, the idea of Restorative Justicehas been known since the 1970s which at that time appeared in Ontario, Canada related to the case vandalism which later became the initial turning point for the development of Restorative Justicein the world, which was demonstrated by several policies by international organizations such as NOVA, and the United Nations. So that in Indonesia, alternatives to solving crimes have begun to appear through Restorative Justicewith the dynamics of an increasing number of cases which have resulted in many pros and cons of settlements related to several things such as the age of the suspect and other material losses. Restorative Justiceby Tito Karnavian then in 2021 it will be included in one of the priority programs of the Chief of Police which in 2021 will issue Perpol No. 8 of 2021 concerning restorative justice, this will also be carried out in the jurisdiction of the Sukoharjo Police which is carried out by the Criminal Investigation Unit, especially Unit 1 Tindak Pidana Umum of the Sukoharjo Police The purpose of this research is to identify problems related to the performance of unit 1 Tindak Pidana Umum satreskrim Polres Sukoharjo in handling criminal acts through restorative justice. This research is a qualitative research using data collection methods in the form of interviews, observations, and document processing to informants in the jurisdiction of the Sukoharjo Police. organizational resources and systems & methods of handling the case.
References
Kurniawan Tri.2022.Implementasi Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Kakarta
Andi, Hamzah. 1994. Masalah Penegakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta. hlm 21,17
Agus, Dharma. 2006. Manajemen Supervisi. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Bdgk, RM Surachman. 2009. Frame of Reference Para Pendiri Republik. Yogyakarta:Pustaka Belajar.
Ekobudi. 2015. Penerapan Hukum Progresif Dalam Penegakan Hukum di Indonesia.
Gouzali, Saydam. 2005. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia: Suatu Pendekatan Mikro. Jakarta:Djambaran.
Gregor, Polancik. 2009. Empirical Research Method Poster. Jakarta.
Hasibuan, Malayu S.P. 2016. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Penerbit PT Bumi Aksara.
Kadarisman, M. 2013. Manajemen Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta:PT. Raja Grafindo Persada
Kartini, Kartono. 1998. Pengantar Metodologi Research, Bandung:ALUMNI.
Liebmann, Marian. 2007. E-Book Restorative Justice: How it Works.
Meliansyah, Eki. 2015. Pengertian Tinjauan Pustaka dan Penyusunan Kerangka Pikir.
Moleong, J. Lexy. 2010. Metodologi Penelitian kualitatif Edisi Revisi. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Prayitno, Kuat Puji. 2012. ‘Restorative Justiceuntuk Peradilan Di Indonesia (Perspektif Yuridis Filosofis dalam Penegakan Hukum In Concreto)’ Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jenderal Soedirman:Dinamika Hukum.
Prayitno, Kuat Puji. 2012. Aplikasi Konsep Restorative Justicedalam Peradilan Indonesia, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta.
Proyek Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mahkamah Agung. 2000. Laporan Penelitian Alternative Dispute Resolution (Penyelesaian Sengketa Alternatfi) dan Cour Connected Dispute Resolution (Penyelesaian Sengketa Yang Terkait dengan Pengadilan. Hlm.6
R. Sugiharto. 2012. Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia dan Sekilas Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Beberapa Negara. Unissula Press. Semarang.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. (Ed.) 2006. Membedah Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Kompas.
Salusu, J. 1996. Pengambilan Keputusan Strategik untuk Organisasi Publik dan Organisasi non Profit. Jakarta : PT Grasindo
Sarwirini, ‘Impementasi Restorative JusticeDalam Penegakan Hukum Pajak’ (2014) Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga, Yuridika: Volume 29, No 3, hlm: 380 s.d 396, hlm. 383.
Sondang P. Siagian. 2009. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, PT Bumi Aksara, Jakarta, hlm. 184
Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung : Alfabeta, CV.
Wibowo. 2007. Manajemen Kinerja. Edisi Kedua. Penerbit PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Jakarta.
Yusuf, Anas. 2016. Implementasi Restorative Justicedalam Penegakkan Hukum Polri.
Peraturan perundang-undangan :
Peraturan Kepala Kepolisian RI No. 5 Tahun 2016 Tentang Penyelenggaraan Assessement Center Polri.
Peraturan Kepolisian RI No. 8 Tahun 2021 Tentang Penanganan Tindak Pidana Melalui Restorative Justice.
Peraturan Kapolri No. 9 Tahun 2011 tentang Manajemen Operasional Kepolisian.
Peraturan Pemerintah No. 58 Tahun 2010 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 27 Tahun 1983 Tentang Pelaksanaan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.
Undang-undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia.
Undang-Undang RI Nomor 8 Tahun 1981.
Skripsi :
Fajar Gemilang, Mochamad. 2012. "Penggunaan Restorative JusticeDalam Penanganan Perkara Pidana Pada Sat Reskrim Polresta Yogyakarta". Skripsi. Jakarta: STIK-PTIK.
Flora, Henny Saida. "Keadilan Restoratif Sebagai Alternatif Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Dan Pengaruhnya Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia." University Of Bengkulu Law Journal 3.2 (2018): 142-158.
Internet :
https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2022/02/14/13432861/survei-litbang-kompas-83-persen-responden-setuju-penegak-hukum-lebih
https://polri.go.id/berita-polri/239
https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5941191/survei-litbang-kompas-mayoritas-responden-setuju-restorative-justice
