The Role of Bhabinkamtibmas in Resolving Community Disputes Through Focus Group Discussion in the Jurisdiction of the Talun Polres Police Blitar
Abstract
Disputes that frequently occur in the community can disrupt the maintenance of public security and order. The Focus Group Discussion (FGD) activity can be used by Bhabinkamtibmas (community police officers) as a way to communicate with village officials and the surrounding community to prevent disturbances to public security and order. This research aims to describe the role of Bhabinkamtibmas in resolving community disputes through FGD within the jurisdiction of Talun Police Station, Blitar Police Department, and to understand the impact of the FGD activities conducted by Bhabinkamtibmas on improving the relationship between the community and Bhabinkamtibmas in the Talun Police jurisdiction. This study uses conceptual literature, including the concepts of Bhabinkamtibmas, FGD, resolving community disputes, role theory, social interaction theory, and communication theory. The research applies a qualitative approach with field research. Data collection techniques include interviews, observations, and document studies. Data validity is ensured through data triangulation. The data analysis technique involves data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and verification. The research findings indicate that some Bhabinkamtibmas officers are less active and less knowledgeable about their material but are supported by an active community in expressing their aspirations. The role of Bhabinkamtibmas accommodates the dimension of conflict prevention. Bhabinkamtibmas builds a trust-based relationship that facilitates early detection and prevention of future conflicts. The role of Bhabinkamtibmas in resolving community disputes through FGD has an impact on village officials, as they become more actively involved in addressing community issues in their respective areas. The role of Bhabinkamtibmas in resolving community disputes through FGD in the Talun Police jurisdiction is considered effective and proactive.
References
Dalam Jurnal At-Taujih. No. 1. Hal. 17-31.
9
Afiyanti, Y. 2008. ‘Focus Group Discussion (Diskusi Kelompom Terarah) Sebagai Metode
Pengumpulan Data Penelitian Kualitatif. Jurnal Keperawatan Indonesia. No. 1. Hal. 58-62.
Biddle, B.J. dan E.J. Thomas. 1966. Role Theory: Concept and Research. New York: Wiley.
Hadi, S. dan Radiyatul. 2014. ‘Metode Pemecahan Masalah Menurut Polya untuk Mengembangkan
Kemampuan Siswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematis di Sekolah Menengah Pertama’. Dalam
Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. No. 1. Hal. 53-61.
Indrizal, E. 2014. ‘Diskusi Kelompok Terarah’. Dalam Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya. No.
1. Hal. 77-81.
Mulyadi, Y.Y. dan F. Liauw. 2020. ‘Wadah Interaksi Sosial’. Dalam Jurnal STUPA. No. 1. Hal. 37-44.
Mustakim dan Kasmar. 2022. ‘Tugas Kordinasi Bhabinkamtibmas dalam Pengawasan Penggunaan
Dana Desa’. Dalam Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan (JISIP). No. 1. Hal. 1964-1968.
Nilamsari, N. 2014. ‘Memahami Studi Dokumen dalam Penelitian Kualitatif’. Dalam Jurnal Wacana.
No. 2. Hal. 177-181.
Rosana, E. 2015. ‘Konflik pada Kehidupan Masyarakat (Telaah Mengenai Teori dan Penyelesaian
Konflik pada Masyarakat Modern)’. Dalam Jurnal Studi Lintas Agama. No. 2. Hal. 216-230.
Suharman, E., A. Satrio, dan H. Sofyan. 2020. ‘Kajian Teori dalam Penelitian’. Dalam Jurnal Kajian
Teknologi Pendidikan. No. 1. Hal. 49-58.
Wahyurudhanto, A. 2018. ‘Analisis Kemampuan Deteksi Dini oleh Bhabinkamtibmas dalam
Implementasi Polmas sebagai Penguat Program Satu Polisi Satu Desa’. Dalam Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian.
No. 2. Hal. 85-98.
