Effort of Investigation by Satreskrim to Improve the Disclosure of Theft Crimes in Brebes Police

Gede Andika Surya  Wibisana

Gede Andika Surya Wibisana Taruna

Keywords: Upaya, Penyelidikan, Satreskrim

Abstract

Theft has now become a complex problem that is currently faced by the world including the Indonesian nation. It has been the main task of the police as law enforcement cracks down firmly on suspected perpetrators of theft crimes. However, in the investigation activities, there are weaknesses that make it not optimal, which is found to be factors - both internal factors such as human resources, infrastructure, budget, supervision and external such as public behavior that hinders the investigation of theft crimes. The preparation of this thesis uses a qualitative approach with a type of field research. Then to discuss the problems of the investigation of theft crimes by Satreskrim Brebes researchers use SWOT theory, management and related concepts focus the problem in this thesis. The results of this study can be concluded that the implementation of the investigation of theft crimes in Brebes police has not been running optimally. This is indicated by the decrease in the number of disclosure of theft crimes in the last 2 (two) year with several factors that affect it, among others, human resources that are not qualified and adequate, infrastructure that does not meet the needs of investigations, budgets that are not in accordance with the needs in the field, and supervision that has not been maximizedwhere this will be an obstacle in the investigation of theft crimes in Brebes police in the future.

References

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Buku:
A. Pearce, John II, Richard B.Robinson, Jr. 2014. Manajemen strategi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Assauri, S. (2008). Manajemen Produksi dan Operasi. Jakarta: Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia.
Depdikbud. (1995). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Dessler, G. (2005). Human Resource Management. International Edition, 10 Edition, Pearson Education, Inc.
Hidayat, Kosadi. 1990. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Bandung.
Undang-Undang No. 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.
Lofland, John & Lyn.H.Lofland. (1984). Analyzing Social Settings. California: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Hasan, M. Iqbal, Pokok-pokok Materi Metodologi Penelitian dan Aplikasinya, Ghalia Indonesia, Bogor, 2002
Miles, M.B & Huberman A.M. 1984, Analisis Data Kualitatif. Terjemahan oleh Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi. 1992. Jakarta : Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.
Moleong, L.J. 2019. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muhadjir, P. D. (1996). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasisn
Muhammad, Prof. Dr. Farouk & Prof. Dr. H. Djaali. 2005. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial. Jakarta: PTIK Press dan Restu Agung
R.Terry, George. Prinsip- Prinsip Manajemen. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2006)
Soekanto, Soerjono, 1986, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Universitas Indonesia
Sugandhi, R. 1980. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (K.U.H.P) Dengan Penjelasannya. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.
Sugiyono, 2020. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta. Winardi, Dasar- Dasar Ilmu Manajemen. (Bandung: Penerbit Alumni, 1979)

Hukum dan perundang-undangan:
Peraturan Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia No. 23 tahun 2010 tentang Susunan Organisasi dan Tata Kerja pada Tingkat Polres dan Polsek. (t.thn.).
Undang-Undang No. 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Republik Indonesia. (2002). Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara.
Undang-Undang No. 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana. (t.thn.)