Optimizing the Performance of the Samapta Unit to Prevent the Criminal Act of Theft with Agraming in the Jurisdiction of Polresta Pati
Abstract
The number of cases of theft by weighting in the jurisdiction of Polresta Pati was ranked first with the highest number among other cases of theft, curas, and theft by weighting (3C). This indicates that it is known that the Samapta Polresta Pati Unit has not been able to achieve its objective optimally, namely to maintain public security and order. This research focuses on the implementation of patrols and efforts to increase patrols by the Pati Police Samapta Unit in preventing criminal acts of theft by weighting. The method used in this study uses a qualitative approach, with the aim of obtaining complete and actual facts, which are reviewed by the optimization concept, the patrol concept, the theft concept by weighting. The theory used in this study is Management Theory using POAC (Planning, Organizing, Actuating, Controlling and SWOT analysis theory (Strength, Weakness, Opportunities, Threat). The research results obtained indicate that there are still a number of obstacles experienced by the Samapta Polresta Pati Unit in patrol activities ranging from limited human resources, ineffective patrol time, minimal allocation of patrol funds, and less than optimal use of police technology. It can be concluded that the implementation of patrols by the Pati Police Samapta Unit cannot be said to be optimal. This is because some of the patrol implementation processes cannot be fully implemented. The organizational resources of the Pati Police Samapta Unit in preventing criminal acts of theft by weighting can also be said to be not ideal. It is recommended for the Samasta Polresta Pati Unit to optimize and improve the implementation of patrols by conducting special guidance, utilizing organizational resources at the Samasta Polresta Unit such as creating special modules, conducting outreach to the community, making patrol programs more efficient.
References
A.A. Anwar Prabu Mangkunegara, 2000. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Afifuddin, H, and Beni Ahmad Saebani. 2009. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
Afrizal. 2014. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: PT, RajaGrafindo Persada
Arikunto, Suharsimi, 1995. Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta Badrudin, B. 2013. Dasar-Dasar Manajmen, (4), 1-141. Bandung
: Alfabeta
Lexy J, Moleong, 2011. Metodelogi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya
Poerwadarminta WJS. 1997. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia.
Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Rangkuti, Freddy. 2017. Analisis SWOT Teknik Membedah Kasus Bisnis. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Sugiyono, 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D. Bandung : IKAPI
PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN:
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian negara Republik Indonesia. 2002. Jakarta: Mabes Polri
Peraturan Kepala Badan Pemeliharaan Keamanan Polri Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 tentang Patroli
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Pasal 363 tentang Pencurian dengan Pemberatan
SKRIPSI :
Imbollo. 2017. “Optimalisasi Patroli Roda Empat Satuan Sabhara Dalam Mencegah Tindak Pidana Pencurian dengan pemberatan Di Wilayah Hukum Polresta Kudus”. Skripsi. Akademi Kepolisian
Pramasrullah, Rizal Gulam. 2021. “Peran Patroli Dialogis Roda Empat Unit Turjawali Satuansabhara Dalam Mencegah Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dengan Pemberatan Di Wilayah Hukum Polresta Blitar Kota”. Skripsi. Akademi Kepolisian.
Cahyono, Denzel. 2022. “Optimalisasi Patroli Roda Dua Satuan Samapta Guna Mencegah Tindak Pidana Pencurian dengan Pemberatan Di Wilayah Hukum Polres Brebes”. Skripsi. Akademi Kepolisian